voice for democracy

Abortions, guns and judicial power in a democracy: What's at stake at SCOTUS | Opinion – Yahoo News

The Supreme Court’s two blockbuster cases this term — one on abortion rights and one on gun rights — provide a litmus test for how the current crop of justices will use their power to declare laws unconstitutional. This power — known as “judicial review” — is not mentioned in the Constitution. Nevertheless, the justices laid claim to it back in 1803 in the landmark opinion, Marbury v. Madison.
Ever since Marbury, the justices have sparred over when it is appropriate to wield this power. The controversy exists because judicial review, as the late Yale law professor Alexander Bickel put it, is a “deviant institution in American democracy.” It allows a small number of unelected judges to overturn laws enacted by the people’s elected representatives.
For example, when the Supreme Court declared that same-sex couples have a right to marry, the five justices in the majority used judicial review to overturn laws that defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman. The majority said its invalidation of these democratically enacted laws was necessary to protect the dignity and equality of gays and lesbians. As Justice Anthony Kennedy explained, laws that deny same-sex couples the extensive benefits of marriage afforded to opposite-sex couples “disrespect and subordinate” same-sex couples and stigmatize their children.
The four dissenting justices painted a starkly different picture of the majority abusing judicial power to usurp the public’s right to define marriage.
“Five lawyers,” Chief Justice John Roberts protested, “have closed the debate and enacted their own vision of marriage as a matter of constitutional law.”
Justice Antonin Scalia said the majority robbed the people of their most important liberty: “the freedom to govern themselves.”
This same debate — about when it is appropriate to use judicial review to override democratically elected laws — is at the heart of the abortion and guns rights cases currently before the Court. The conventional wisdom is that conservative justices want to use judicial review to expand gun rights while shrinking constitutional protection for abortion rights. Liberal justices want to do the opposite.
Abortion: I grew up a Texan evangelical Christian. I'm not a single-issue voter any more.
Dear Supreme Court:3.5 million Americans in territories deserve same federal benefits
Which side has the better argument?
Let’s start with the abortion case. Mississippi is asking the justices to overturn Roe v. Wade or at least permit states to ban abortions after 15 weeks into a pregnancy.
Whether Roe should be overturned depends upon whether that case properly restricted the government’s ability to regulate a woman’s decision to terminate a pregnancy. To answer that, ask yourself this question: Do you think legislators should be able to force a woman to carry even an early-stage pregnancy to term? If your answer is no, then the Roe justices got it right.
The second issue is more complicated. At what point in a pregnancy may the government intervene to protect the fetus? Roe set this line at “viability” — when a fetus is viable outside the mother’s womb, typically around 24 weeks. Mississippi wants to move the line to 15 weeks. There is no simple answer to this question, but the justices must be vigilant against attempts to move the line so early in a pregnancy as to negate a woman’s right to choose. That is what Texas intended to do with Senate Bill 8, which moved the line up to six weeks.
The gun rights case raises the question of whether the Second Amendment gives people a right to carry weapons outside their homes. To date, the Court has said only that people have right to possess a handgun at home.
Certainly, the government has a responsibility to keep its citizens safe. Yet it is by no means clear whether allowing people to carry weapons in public will make citizens safer or less safe. The answer requires a complicated data analysis and risk assessment – a judgment more appropriately made by politically accountable representatives than by nine lawyers in robes. In this case, the justices should keep the big gun of judicial review in its holster. Legislators should be free to balance gun rights and public safety without judicial interference.
The liberal justices have the better arguments. But the conservative justices outnumber the liberals.
Alan Garfield is a professor at Widener University Delaware Law School.
This article originally appeared on Delaware News Journal: SCOTUS considers abortions, guns and judicial power
Understanding any topic is needed to grow. So why does it seem like understanding racism is a scary proposition for so many? John Rolfe discusses.
Residents filed the lawsuit earlier this year saying the ordinance conflicts with state law.
TheWrap's "How I Did It" video series kicks off with wardrobe maestros Jacqueline West and Bob Morgan, who drew inspiration from Frank Herbert and the Jordan desert
The Senate minority leader failed to mention his years-long campaign to strong-arm the nation's judiciary to the right.
If you’re a legislator, knowing the president’s party always takes a beating in the first mid-terms, do you want to tie yourself to Biden?
Sports Seriously: The Washington Football Team has narrowed its list of potential new names down to eight finalists. We asked Chase Young to grade the candidates, and he did not hold back his disdain for basically all of them.
The return by the Rams to Lambeau Field already stood out as one of the most intriguing games of Week Twelve. That game has gotten a lot more intriguing. With Beckham, who meandered through various top choices over the course of the past seven days, ultimately picking the Rams over the Packers, the cheeseheads likely [more]
Cuba opens its borders next week signaling new opportunity for pandemic-weary travelers and the island's tourism industry, but for U.S. citizens getting there requires jumping through hoops like never before, according to the heads of eight U.S. tour agencies. U.S. President Donald Trump ended cruise ship dockings, reduced flights to Havana and eliminated them altogether to the outlying provinces. "U.S. obstacles are the most significant in our more than 22 years of doing business in Cuba," said Michael Zuccato, head of Cuba Travel Services.
Letter: “If you’re outraged over a ‘man pageant’ and a simulation of adult entertainment in a school, you should be equally outraged by other morally questionable behavior or policies.”
South Dakota lawmakers are pressing Gov. Kristi Noem’s administration to hand over a document that could prove whether a plan was in place to give her daughter another chance to win a real estate appraiser license prior to a meeting last year that has spurred conflict-of-interest questions. The Legislature's Government Operations and Audit Committee is readying to initiate a subpoena Monday if the Department of Labor and Regulation doesn't hand over a signed agreement between the governor’s daughter, Kassidy Peters, and state regulators. Peters won her appraiser certification after a state agency moved to deny it last year.
The Justice Department has made clear that the Jan. 6 committee is out to get answers, and there will be real consequences for anyone who stands in its way
Thirteen years ago, Barack Obama deployed some of his cold-eyed analysis when it came time to pick a running mate. Despite the occasional gaffe and errant political admission, Biden was unfailingly loyal to Obama even when they had deep and sincere disagreements.
Former White House Coronavirus Response team member Dr. Scott Atlas blasted Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Deborah Birx and former CDC Director Robert Redfield in a new book saying that he was “disgusted” by their dismissal of scientific data he presented to them during the Trump administration.
Legislators in the Republican-dominated House and Senate faced a dilemma: cross the governor who had become a national rock star with the Republican base, or find a work-around that would appease both sides.
Gov. Kim Reynolds said in a letter that it is only the second time in Iowa history that a governor has taken such a step.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A U.S. appeals court on Friday tossed out greenhouse gas emissions rules for heavy-duty truck trailers, ruling two government agencies had exceeded their authority. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in 2016 set rules for the first time requiring trailer manufacturers to adopt fuel-saving technologies like side skirts and automatic tire pressure systems. The administration of then-President Barack Obama said it was important to regulate the fuel efficiency of the trailer portion of commercial tractor-trailers "because large tractor-trailers account for 60% of the fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions from heavy-duty vehicles."
At least 13 former Trump administration officials, including Jared Kushner and Kayleigh McEnany, pictured here, violated the Hatch Act, according to a new federal investigation released Nov. 9, 2021. AP Photo/Alex BrandonThirteen top officials of the Trump administration violated the federal law known as the Hatch Act, which prohibits political campaigning while employed by the federal government. That’s the conclusion of a federal government report issued by the Special Counsel, Henry Kerner. T
It would be "inconceivable" for Australia not to join the United States should Washington take action to defend Taiwan, Australian Defence Minister Peter Dutton said on Saturday. On Wednesday, U.S. Secretary of State Anthony Blinken said the United States and its allies would take unspecified "action" https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/us-allies-would-take-action-if-taiwan-attacked-blinken-2021-11-10 if China were to use force to alter the status quo over Taiwan.
A former university professor and retired military man has announced his candidacy for U.S. Senate.
A White House official said Trump had an "active imagination" after the former president said sent an "envoy ambassador" to the Kosovo-Serbia border.