voice for democracy

What the German election taught America about democracy – The Business Standard

Last month’s German national election stood in stark contrast to the most recent US presidential and congressional vote. One favoured rationality, centrist parties, adult leadership, and the rejection of an extreme nationalist alternative.
The other narrowly averted reelecting a right-wing nationalist authoritarian who roused his supporters into a violent attempt to overthrow the results by force—and who retains the support of over 30 per cent of the electorate. The former was, of course, Germany, and the latter was one of the world’s oldest democracies, the United States.
This past year has witnessed a remarkable role reversal. After all, it was the United States that tutored and installed democracy in a devasted and divided Germany following the defeat of Adolf Hitler. The United States provided expertise, including that of German expatriates such as Carl Friedrich and others who helped draft the West German Constitution, the Grundgesetz. They laid the foundation for a successful democracy at a time when Germany had very few democrats and many had collaborated or actively supported the Nazi regime. The prospects for success seemed dim, but, unlike the failed Weimar Republic, the new republic had time to consolidate—not least because of the market-based economic recovery known as the Wirtschaftswunder. With the Cold War freezing Germany’s division into place, the country had 40 years to prepare for national reunification, a long, difficult, and still incomplete process of integrating 17 million East Germans who had not experienced democracy for almost 60 years.
Now, Germany is a model around the world and more favourably viewed in many countries than the United States, as shown by a recent Pew Research Center international survey. What lessons can Americans concerned about the current state and future of their democracy take from the German experience?
German democracy has its shortcomings. The emphasis on consensus means that reforms are difficult; change is clearly incremental. Regulations and the bureaucracy can be stifling. The division between the states of the former East Germany—where the AfD is strongest—and the western states is a version of the divide between Republican and Democratic states in the United States. In part because its system blocks so much change, Germany has fallen behind in key areas of digital technology that are crucial to its future competitiveness. With the emergence of a six-party system, this will be the first time in recent history that three parties will form a coalition government, which will surely test them. But these are problems and shortcomings most Americans would trade for the ones they currently confront. Americans can take some pride in helping to establish democracy in Germany, but they could do worse than learn from its success.
Stephen F Szabo is an adjunct professor of German and European studies at Georgetown University and a senior fellow at the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies.
Disclaimer: This article first appeared on Foreignpolicy.com and is published under a special syndication arrangement.
Foreign Policy / American Election / German Election / politics
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderation decisions are subjective. Published comments are readers’ own views and The Business Standard does not endorse any of the readers’ comments.
The Business Standard
Main Office -4/A, Eskaton Garden, Dhaka- 1000
Phone: +8801847 416158 – 59
Send Opinion articles to – [email protected]
For advertisement- [email protected]
Copyright © 2021 THE BUSINESS STANDARD All rights reserved. Technical Partner: RSI Lab